Coffee vs. Conservation

Field Report #5
Location: Buenos Aires

Conservation zones are often in regions that are difficult to access and have been so for a very long time. If they were more accessible, people would already have been there, leaving their footprints, and there would be less worth conserving. So it is with Cusuco. Cusuco is challenging terrain both by foot and by vehicle.

Buenos Aires is the closest town to Cusuco. It’s the lowest “camp”. By camp I mean we eat three meals a day in a restaurant and stay with local families. But we still do science, though it’s a longer trek to the reseaarch areas than from the other camps. The area immediately around the town is a mix of fragmented forests, small holdings comprised predominately of coffee plantations with occasional plantain, yucca, or corn, but mostly coffee.

As a result of Opwall’s presence, I suspect the economy has grown. It seems people typically make $1-2/day growing coffee, but working for Opwall brings in significantly more. Muchulados (sherpas) make $8/day, cooks make about $10/day, guides can make up to $15/day. This year as well, any locally employed people receive healthcare as well.

The other day, Chip and I finished up our birding with a trip to the school. It was highly productive visit for Chip who has been working here for a number of years. He’d like to see more conservation efforts and was investigating the possibility of using the school as a cafe with hummingbird and oriole feeders to increase tourism in the park. While there we also learned of a NGO that was working on reforestation with a number of species being started on the school grounds. Unfortunately, the school and its students aren’t involved, but it’s a promising enterprise.

As I mentioned previously, initially the local people were eager to bring specimens to the camp. While that practice has been stopped, people have changed their behaviors due to Opwall. Since Opwall arrived 11 years ago, there has been a local movement to grow shade grown coffee. Many of the science staff (non-Honduran) here are outright skeptical about it, but from digging a little further, it seems that shade-grown is a recent phenomenon. People in town have gone as far as forming a cooperative. I am not entirely sure whether people are attempting to reintroduce cloud forest trees into their fields or if they are continuing to expand the plantations into the forest. I suspect it is a bit of both. Regardless, there is a wide range of shade in the shade grown coffee fields.

Every day, there is coffee served twice a day. Locally sourced coffee, which means for better or for worse Opwall is supporting some level of deforestation as they fight to conserve the forests.

Some of the most foundational work is done by the Habitat team. They use the same sites year after year where they measure changes to the forest. Louis and I helped out with the Habitat surveys our last day in BA. We did the bird work on the way out and habitat work on the way in. We were responsible for measuring the girth of all the trees within the plots with a dbh greater than 15cm. Rick did some other measurements including vegetation density, canopy coverage, and tree height. Some of these sites fall in coffee plantations. Some years the scientists return to find the sites have been replaced by coffee plantations. It’s a measurement of the human impact on this remote forest.

Fields and forest surrounding Buenos Airess. Cusuco National Park, Honduras. Photo taken June 25, 2015.

Fields and forest surrounding Buenos Airess. Cusuco National Park, Honduras. Photo taken June 25, 2015.

Puppies and Penguins for a Perfect Planet

What is more perfect than puppies protecting endangered penguin populations from predation?

Maremma puppy.  Photo from the Dodo.

Maremma puppy, presumably one of the individuals in penguin protection training. But nevertheless, cute! Photo from the Dodo.

In a quickly transforming world where job skills are constantly changing, Maremma guardian dogs are being retrained for a new job market.  Scientists and trainers are shifting the genetically selected behaviors of Maremma guardian dogs from guarding sheep to guarding the Little Blue Penguin (Eudyptula minor) of Australia from an invasive species of Red Fox.

The breeding population dropping to a low of 4 in 2004-2005 has since risen to 200 thanks to the puppy protection program.

One of the most amazing aspects of this conservation program?  It didn’t come from scientists.  It came from an ordinary citizen.  Imagine what progress we could make if everyone cared about conservation.

Little Blue Penguins, locally known as Fairy Penguins for their small stature.  Are also known as Chooks in Suits. | Photo from the Dodo.

Little Blue Penguins, locally known as Fairy Penguins for their small stature. Are also known as Chickens in Suits. Photo from the Dodo.

References and Additional Reading:
Via Meet The Dogs Responsible For The Itty Bitty Fairy Penguins’ Comeback.
Check out their website here: Flagstaff Hill
Middle Island Little Penguin Monitoring Program Season Report 2012-2013

Read about this yesterday and can’t get it out of my mind so I thought I’d share.   A birding centered post will be up shortly!

WOD2014: Penguins and Cormorants

World Ocean Day 2014 from Galapagos Conservation Trust

Galapagos Penguin swimming in the waters along Bartolome Island, one of the filming locations of Master and Commander. Bartolome Island, Galapagos, Ecuador.  Photo taken January 2014.

Galapagos Penguin swimming in the waters along Bartolome Island, one of the filming locations of Master and Commander. Bartolome Island, Galapagos, Ecuador. Photo taken January 2014.

The wonderful thing about traveling is that it creates for you a connection with a new place. After having visiting the Galapagos in January 2014, I definitely pay more attention to the news about the islands. Galapagos Conservation Trust has been highlighting oceanic animals as they lead up to today, World Ocean Day.  I’m sharing a portion of their most recent post below.

The Galapagos penguin and flightless cormorant are both somewhat uncharacteristic when compared to their close relatives…  Penguin and cormorant populations now number just 2,000 individuals each and the species are currently classified as endangered and vulnerable respectively. With a range of threats, including predation by introduced species, avian disease, habitat loss and climate change, the management and conservation of the remaining individuals is now at a critical point.

via WOD2014: Penguins and Cormorants.  Please continue and read for yourselves.

Natural and Unnatural History IX

I’m traveling in the Galapagos currently.  Hopefully I’m having fun and seeing great birds and other species!  In the meantime here’s a little of what I will hopefully be seeing!

The Galapagos’s Natural and Unnatural History: Tiputini Research Station (Amazon)*
*Not a part of the Galapagos, but a special feature

Collectively, we were so overwhelmed and excited by the prospects within the Galapagos we didn’t realize we’d also be traveling to the Amazon.

Like the CDRS, the Tiputini Research Station has a similar goal of promoting conservation through science, education, and ecotourism.  Located in the heart of pristine Amazonion forest in Ecuador, the region is one of the  world’s most biologically hot spots for insects, birds, plants, you name it.   From their website,

We welcome all interested, serious visitors to the Tiputini Biodiversity Station. While we are not involved in typical tourism, we are pleased to have opportunities to receive two primary groups of visitors – scientists and students. Recognizing that today fewer people than ever before have access to wilderness areas and therefore, less overall appreciation of nature, we wish to expose as many individuals as possible to the wonders of Yasuní so that more may understand why it should be protected and maintained.
Tiputini, Universidad San Fransisco de Quito

The Huaorani are the indigenous people whose land the station resides on.  One of the travel reads I’ll be bringing with me is Savages, a work detailing the lives and history of this people.

I’ve done extensive preparation for what we might encounter in each region we’re traveling to and Tiputini is no different.  I’ve generated lists, from ebird data for what can be seen in each location during the month of January and I didn’t leave Tiputini off the list. To tell the truth, my heart did quiver a bit when I saw how long the list was compared to those for the Galapagos.  254 species some species with which I am already familiar: Black-and-white Warbler, Great Kiskadee, Black Vulture, etc., others whose families are at least familar: Motmots, Macaws, Oropendolas, Woodpecker, Hawk, Wren and Woodcreeper; then those who are entirely new: Antpittas, Antwrens, and Antbirds (yes, there are more Ant variations),  Tapaculo, Foliage-gleaners, Becards, and Manakins. Oh my!  And yes, they have owls.

Video: Visiting Tiputini Biological Research Station


  • BU: Tiputini Research Station
  • Tiputini, Universidad San Fransisco de Quito
  • Natural and Unnatural History VIII

    I’m traveling in the Galapagos currently.  Hopefully I’m having fun and seeing great birds and other species!  In the meantime here’s a little of what I will hopefully be seeing!

    The Galapagos’s Natural and Unnatural History: Charles Darwin Research Station

    One of the places we’ll be visiting is the Charles Darwin Research Station (CDRS). Founded in 1964, the CDRS is tasked with conserving the Galapagos.  Over 100 scientists from Ecuador and around the world collaborate in the race to preserve the archipelago.  One of the projects they are best known for is their conservation and breeding programs for the tortoises.

    Also, the CDRS works with the Galapagos National Park Service in the conservation mission.  Over 97% of the land is preserved.   With such protection is there still a threat to the islands?

    In 2007, the UNESCO added the Galapagos National Park to its List of World Heritage Sites in Danger, reflecting the dangers posed by a fast pace of human development in all its areas: immigration, tourism and trade, all increasing the likelihood of introduction of invasive species to the islands. This represents the gravest danger to the fragile ecosystems which have evolved over millions of years in natural isolation.
    – Wikipedia

    The Galapagos is truly a microcosm for the world.  If evolution is more stark here, so are the troubles that face every region: the balance between human needs and environmental needs.  In a country where the average income is $5,000 (the base cost of the trip), the Galapagos for many represent hope for a better life.   So immigration there increases as people hope to make a better living profiting from the tourists.  They need more land, more resources, have more of an impact on the ecosystems.   Many tour operators and shops operate under ecotourism principals, but not all of them, and it is the savvy traveler who can distinguish between them.  Not to mention that even the most conscious of operators or travelers may be the unwitting conduct transporting a surprise guest onto a new island.

    Do I feel guilty for traveling there and contributing to the burden?  Of course I do.  It’s a complex situation with few clear answers.

    Video: Visiting the Charles Darwin Research Station in the Galapagos (National Geographic)


    Natural and Unnatural History VII

    I’m traveling in the Galapagos currently.  Hopefully I’m having fun and seeing great birds and other species!  In the meantime here’s a little of what I will hopefully be seeing!

    The Galapagos’s Natural and Unnatural History: Darwin’s Finches Today

    I probably have been aware of the Galapagos as a place of ecological and evolutionary importance since I took up ecology in college.   I took a wonderful evolutionary class, but it wasn’t until one summer years ago I stumbled across a copy of “The Beak of the Finch” that the enchantment fell upon me. I read it at the shore, I think.  I don’t think I saw much of the beach that vacation.

    The “The Beak of the Finch” juxtaposes current research on Darwin’s finches, with Darwin’s development of his theory, with related work on microevolution (essentially evolution that occurs in measurable time; which are generally very small changes).   In the previous post on evolution, the example of strong selection for chess players over athletes for a generation is an example of microevolution.

    Many people – even biologists, even today – find the power of slight variations hard to believe.  “Once just as I was beginning a lecture, a biologist in the audience interrupted me: ‘ How much difference do you claim to see,’ he asked me, ‘between the beak of a finch that survives and the beak of a finch that dies?’
    ‘One half millimeter,’ I told him.
    ‘I don’t believe it!’ the man said. ‘I don’t believe a half millimeter really matters so much.’
    ‘Well that’s the fact,’ I said. ‘Watch my data and then ask questions.’ And he asked no questions.”
    – Peter Grant, The Beak of the Finch

    But I digress, you’re probably more interested in the finches than data and theory.  In the late 1970s, Rosemary and Peter Grant, of Princeton University, embarked on a study of the finches of Daphne Major, a small island in the archipelago.  What was meant to be a couple year study has blossomed into a lifetime’s worth of work from the wealth of information they’ve gleaned that has transformed our understanding of evolution.  The Grants were the first to witness evolution in action.  From the time of Darwin we could find evidence that evolution had occurred but no one could say “Here, now is evolution. I saw it!” It was a big thorn in the on-process of convincing skeptics, in fact it even gave Darwin doubt.

    Scientists have looked for it.  By no means were Peter and Rosemary the first. In fact, scientists even returned to the Galapagos, the holy grail, to find evidence there.  It was during David Lack’s time there that he coined “Darwin’s Finches”.

    The Grants arrived in 1973, just after El Nino had finished so food was bountiful.  They observed, measured, counted. For season after season.

    “No one had ever subjected Darwin’s finches  to so many different measurements and indignities, and no one had ever measured so many finches. Over the years, in fact, the Grant team’s measurement of live Darwin’s finches have far surpassed the number of specimens in the world’s museums.”
    –  Beak of the Finch

    Eventually, they got to where the veterans could identify each individual finch by sight (they band them).  Then, in 1977, as mentioned in the climate discussion, La Nina occurred and no rains fell.  That’s when the evolution became truly apparent.  That particular event is considered the strongest directional selection known in science.  Despite the heartbreak, the scientists persevered, collecting and recording.  When they were back in Princeton, between visits, they analyzed.  Then they headed out to the field again.

    By geologic time, the Galapagos are new islands.  Colonization is an ongoing battle.    It’s location with its dramatically shifting climate frequently rewrites the rules for survival.  It’s ripe for watching evolution in action.  Which the Grants have done since the 1970s  and I suspect, they’re just arriving now, for the 40th season.

    The work of the Grants has launched an entire sub-discipline in the study of evolution.  Scientists now scour the world in search of further evidence of microevolution.  They’re finding it in the Guppies of Trinidad, in the Sparrows off the coast of British Columbia, to the cotton pests of the American South, and in our war against bacteria and viruses.

    “What a trifling difference must often determine which shall survive and which perish!”
    – Darwin


    • “Beak of the Finch”. Jonathan Weiner. 1995.

    Natural and Unnatural History VI

    I’m traveling in the Galapagos currently.  Hopefully I’m having fun and seeing great birds and other species!  In the meantime here’s a little of what I will hopefully be seeing!

    The Galapagos’s Natural and Unnatural History: Adaptive Radiation

    When we left off, selection was beginning to act on our small band of finches.  At first there was one: one group, on one island.  They succeeded.  Their meager group grew and they established a sustainable population.  The population continued evolving with those individuals who were better at getting food and mates in this new land disproportionately contributing to the gene pool.  Given enough time, this group will diverge enough so that should it encounter the original population, they would not recognize each other as the same species.

    Time continues, as it does.  Eventually, some individuals brave the oceans, either intentionally or not, and reach a new island.  While this island is not 600 miles away and may only be 1/10th of that distance, it is an effective barrier.  Once again, the founder’s effect repeats itself.  These birds change in new ways from their original population.  And so the story goes.

    In some cases, a very divergent group of finches might venture to an already colonized island.  Then, three things might happen.  They are in direct competition and one group perishes (most likely the arrivals due to number).  They are similar enough that they are the same species and they blend their gene pools. They are different enough they occupy different niches and are not in competition with each other.

    For Darwin’s finches, this occurred 13 times.  There are 13 different species of finches in the Galapagos, so diverse in the niches they evolved to fulfill that Darwin didn’t realize they were all finches.  There are other types of birds that have reached the Galapagos.  Some are endemic meaning, they are only found there; others are widespread.  Endemics include the Galapagos Finches and the Galapagos Penguins (can’t forget those!) while the others include some familiar faces to the readership such as the Barn Owl, Vermillion Flycatcher, Great Blue Heron, and Yellow Warbler.

    The Mockingbirds of the Galapagos share a similar pattern of adaptive radiation though not nearly as radiant.  The finches are special.  Their plasticity has allowed them to fulfill niches on the islands that are typically filled by other families of birds: Woodpecker and Warblers spring to mind as one views the phylogenetic tree below.

    Family (Phylogenic) Tree for Darwin's Finches

    Family (Phylogenetic) Tree for Darwin’s Finches. Courtesy University of West Alabama


    Family Photo Album for Darwin’s Finches. Courtesy of RIT

    No wonder Darwin was so perplexed and we continue to puzzle over the story 178 years later.

    Photo Sources:

    Natural and Unnatural History V

    I’m traveling in the Galapagos currently.  Hopefully I’m having fun and seeing great birds and other species!  In the meantime here’s a little of what I will hopefully be seeing!

    The Galapagos’s Natural and Unnatural History: Founder’s Effect

    In the last missive, I laid forth a hopefully straightforward explanation of  evolution (by natural selection).  Today I’ll explore it’s relevance to the Galapagos.  We have a couple species we could explore: the Mockingbirds, the finches, or the tortoises, or a number of plant species.  But since we’re here presumably due to a shared passion for birds let’s stick with that class.  Did you know, it was actually the mockingbird that inspired Darwin, not the finches named for him?

    Now, the initial post, geology, explored the location of the archipelago, 600 miles from the mainland.  That is noteworthy.  In the third post, human impact, I mentioned that there were discovers before humans and I didn’t mean Doctor Who.   When the volcanic islands first emerged from the sea they were very hot barren rock.  They cooled, but they were still barren rock.   We now know that the invisible air is filled with invisible particles including biotic ones. Dust travels from Africa to become the condensation nuclei in clouds above America; we measured radiation from Japan’s Fukishima reactor in Massachusetts; when the Eyjafjallajökull volcano of Iceland erupted, the aerosol debris grounded flights, stranding people throughout Europe for weeks.   I forget now where I read it, but there was fascinating work done looking at bare rock islands in Iceland after an eruption. The focus was measuring how quickly biotic life reached the resurfaced island through the air.  It was months.  That island was much closer to a biotic source, but it presents a viable mechanism for colonizing the Galapagos.  And thus (we presume) it happened.  Bacteria and algae made their way to the islands where together they formed a symbiotic union and began breaking down the rock to make soil.  They weren’t doing it for any higher purpose; they were only struggling to survive.  After all think of all their fellow travelers who missed landing on any island at all and perished.  After considerable time, soil formed.

    The earliest plants were most likely to reach the island via the airways.  The vast majority of plants on the Galapagos have wind-borne seeds.  A ha.

    Soon (geologically speaking) the animals will arrive.  The birds and the bats (of which there are two species) will also arrive by air, but the rest must make their way by some other fashion.  The fur seals and the sea lions swam, but the reptiles and the insects were likely swept off the mainland on rafts of plant material aimlessly drifting through the ocean.  Mammals, due to their need to eat often, are unlikely to survive the weeks it would take to drift on currents to the islands (but the rice rats did it).  Reptiles, being ectothermic (cold-blooded) and requiring less energy consumption can go extended periods without food; insects can either eat the plant material they’re riding on, or could be transported as eggs or in some stage of torpor, eggs being more likely of the last two.

    It doesn’t take many.  The minimum requirement is a male and a female. These are the founders (think Gilligan’s Island or splinter groups).  Imagine a small flock of finches blown off the South American mainland and out to sea.  As a group, they resolutely fly forward seeing any shelter in a storm.  By great fortune, one might note breaking waves indicating land.  They land.   Though they do not realize it yet, they are home.  There is no going back.  They are the first.   For the earliest arrivals, storm-drenched and dazed, they are fortunate that there are no predators and no competitors to contend with.  A new struggle begins: this time it’s not a battle with the winds, but a battle with the new land.  If they cannot cope, they cannot survive.  Can they find food, can they alter their behaviors to fit this new land?

    If they can find food and begin creating a life for themselves, in essence: if they survive, they can begin reproducing.  Recall the importance of mate choice on evolution as outlined in the fourth article. Whoever it is that landed on the island (and survived) will represent all future genes.  Their genes are the genes that will rebuild the genetic pool.  Because there are so few, the selection of genes is likely to be very skewed.  This is the founder’s effect.   If only small, light-weight birds were blown away from South America, then the gene pool will predominantly feature genes for smaller birds than on the mainland.  Further compounding the Founder’s Effect is that not all arrivals may reproduce.  With the diversity of genes present, some individuals may have traits that make them a very poor candidate for survival on the islands, and they perish.  Gene pool is further diminished.  That is selection.  Of all the small lightweight birds that arrived, imagine some were picky eaters and others were less fussy (generalists).  The fussier eaters, would be less likely to find food, and thus the future generation would be smaller birds than were more generalist in feeding habits than the population on the mainland.

    For now they are the same species.  If reunited, they were merge and mix; the differences separating the two groups would be lost within a generation.  In this scenario, due to the distance, it is improbable.  So each group continues on separate trajectories.  The finches on the mainland continue in their lush tropic climate while the new finches in the arid Galapagos begin drifting, and morphing into something new as a result of their new environment.  Selection is at work.

    Natural and Unnatural History III

    I’m traveling in the Galapagos currently.  Hopefully I’m having fun and seeing great birds and other species!  In the meantime here’s a little of what I will hopefully be seeing!

    The Galapagos’s Natural and Unnatural History: Human Impact

    One of the many names given to the Galapagos, and my personal preference, the Enchanted Isles, evokes a images of a microcosm of Eden.  And much like Eden, the man is the demise of the garden.

    The Enchanted Isles might seem an ironic or sarcastic name, given that the islands at first appear barren and inhospitable to the first human discovers lead by the Bishop of Panama, Fray Tomas de Berlanga in 1535.  (In truth, the island had been discovered much earlier, but that will the subject of a different post!)  He was not impressed.   In his recorded observations, he noted the tameness of the avifauna, and marvels over the tortoises and iguanas, themes to be repeated by travelers for the next ~450 years.  In 1570, the location was first charted onto maps.  By then, the islands had been named “Insule de los Galopegos” (Islands of the Tortoises) and the “Enchanatas” (Bewitched Islands).  In the 1800’s the islands also became known as “Archipielago del Ecuador” and “Archipielago del Colon”.  The islands themselves have Spanish and English names, typically one of each and a few more besides.

    After the Bishop and the mapmaker sailed through, the islands became the retreat of pirates, then penal settlements for political prisoners, and prostitutes. (Not a word I’d ever imagine using on a birding blog, but there you have it.)  Though I suspect there may have been prostitutes during times of the pirates, but that’s sheer supposition.   Between the pirates and the prisoners, the whalers took over briefly, wrecking many a whale and tortoise population. (The tortoises were removed as food sources for the whalers).

    Scientific exploration began in 1790, thus Darwin was not the first scientist to visit the Galapagos in 1835, just the first to realize what a gem it was.  Also, the maps made during Darwin’s travels were in use until the 1950s!

    As each new wave of people came, they left their mark and changed the ecology.  The tameness of each species is noted by Darwin and others.  In fact, Darwin’s first notation regarding the finches named for him, regards the ease with which he killed one inquisitive finch who hopped up to investigate him.

    Goats were introduced in 1813.  Also introduced to the island have been new species of birds, dogs, rats, pigs, and cats for a total of 36 vertebrate species.  To capture the enormity of the invasive forces at work:

    • A total of 36 vertebrate species  including 1 freshwater fish, 2 amphibians (frogs), 4 reptiles (all geckos), 10 birds, and 13 mammals. (Source)

    •  750 introduced plant species have been registered in Galapagos, with nearly 90% of them brought deliberately by humans for agricultural and ornamental purposes. The recent jump in the total number of introduced plants is more a result of increased interest in the problem coupled with more thorough surveys than of any exponential increase in the introduction rate. The majority of introduced plants are not overly invasive. (Source)

    • Approximately 543 alien insect species, more than 1/4 of the total insect fauna, have been registered in Galapagos. Most arrive in Galapagos on lumber, fruits and vegetables, and other organic material. The most serious threats to the Galapagos biota include two fire ant species, two wasp species, a scale insect, and an ectoparasitic fly.  (Source)

    Each new species disrupts the balance among the present species.  Food is limited.  Thus bringing more guests to the table mean less food for those already present.  The same is true for other resources such as water, habitat, territory, etc.  These new species have no natural space in the ecosystem, thus they have no natural check to stymie their growth.

    Humans are responsible for each of these introductions unintentional, well-meaning or otherwise.    The whalers removed 100,o00 tortoises during their stay.  During a two-month stay, one ship removed 5,o00 fur seals.

    Much care has been taken in recent decades to limit human influence.  Invasive species are being eradicated, breeding programs are underway for tortoises, reintroduction programs are on-going, all sorts of scientists are out there watching, learning, restoring, and hoping.

    However, a new trouble looms: tourism.  Even ecotourism, sustainable tourism, or conscious tourism isn’t enough.  While this type of tourism that looks at the impact of the tourism trade and seeks to limit the negative and expand the positive, has consequences. Each species, each individual has an impact, including each tourist.  That cannot be helped.  However the tourism industry, particularly for natural areas and remote regions continues to grow.   Cruise ships now visit the Galapagos, dramatically increasing the number of people visiting and the lure of building economies around tourism.  (Additionally on a sad note, with the growth of the sustainable tourism industry, there has been abuse of the labels by companies who recognize the profit in the labels.) In 2011, the Ecuadorian government attempted to limit cruise ship tourism:

    • “The rules [beginning February 1, 2012] will allow travellers to stay for a maximum of four nights and five days per ship, with a frequency of four landings within any 14-day period.” (Source)
    • The Galapagos receives 150,000 annual visitors yearly, mostly on  Isabela, Santa Cruz and San Cristobal. (Source)
    • In 2012, 170,000 visits were made to the Galapagos. (Source)
    • Additionally, there is an allotted number of tourists allowed per day per island.  (Source)

    Additional Reading:


    Better Late Than Never

    So it’s the Great Backyard Bird Count this weekend!  Unfortunately, a combination of extra hours at work, exams and a baby shower has kept me away from windows and the outdoors this weekend so my participation has been limited.  But work was invited to help kick off the gbbc in a big way.

    On Friday, Fox and Friends did a segment with Wild Birds Unlimited.  The Tenafly Nature Center, where I work, was invited to participate in this component by contributing two of our Animal Ambassadors: Mitzi, the Barred Owl, and Ruby, the Red-tailed Hawk.

    Video: Fox and Friends Segment: February, 15, 2013.

    More about our birds: Mitzi, gender unknown, was a wild bird who was injured as an adult.  The left wing was injured and s/he can’t sustain flight.  However, s/he gets great exercise whenever we enter the aviary as s/he practices evasion maneuvers.

    Ruby, was injured as a juvenile, thus is more tolerant of human presence.  She dislikes being outdone by Mitzi and performs back flips for attention or to avoid annoying tasks.  Ruby is blind in her left eye.

    And yes, we at the center immediately noted that Barred Owl was misspelled.  However, most important, I believe, is the exposure the gbbc, birding, and conservation had their 3 minutes of fame on Fox news.